Comprehensive evaluation of well-deserved audio-visual flagship vivo Xplay

Although you can think of it as a collection of several digital devices, if you take it apart, it seems that none of them can compare with the devices it represents; After many years of advocacy, there is still a little gap from the small card. Although the game has enough hardware support, the feel is still not good. However, everyone is trying to achieve as close as possible. Last year, the emergence of music was such an idea, and the real Hi-Fi high-fidelity sound quality was achieved on mobile phones. Thanks to the adoption of hardware components and soft technology, the sound quality performance of vivo X1 has been recognized by many people.

So BBK also wants to continue this idea, adding images to the pursuit of sound quality, and it was born. However, the demand of video for the system is no more than that of music, and it needs hardware support with better performance; Therefore, we can see that vivo not only added additional operational amplifier chips on the original basis, but also transformed dual speakers, and directly adopted the Snapdragon 600 platform with top performance.

Comprehensive evaluation of well-deserved audio-visual flagship vivo Xplay

The international flagship configuration of 2998 also has Hi-Fi.

On the surface, count these parameters: 5.7-inch LTPS screen, Snapdragon 600 platform, 1Exmor RS camera-basically equivalent to the hardware level of international flagship machine this year. Moreover, the adoption of the three-chip Hi-Fi scheme is unique in the world. On the surface, whether the actual performance can bear the name of "audio-visual flagship", we also try to experience the performance of vivo Xplay from every detail.

Comprehensive evaluation of well-deserved audio-visual flagship vivo Xplay

==============================================================

Survey area: Investigation on the usage of mobile phone voice assistants.(Click preview to see the effect)

Small body, oversized screen.

The big screen is already an irresistible trend of intelligence this year-the fact is that when we compare the parameter of "screen ratio" below, we searched the ZOL mobile phone product library by the way, and there are alreadyUp to 241 modelsThe released and upcoming models use and above screens. This vivo is the bigger among the ranks; Not counting those phone tablets, or larger models, there should be no more than 10 models now.

5. Screen on the front.

The meaning of 2.3mm "narrow border"

However, the large screen of vivo is still very space-saving-the so-called space-saving means to make the "screen visible area" as large as possible while keeping the "body size" as small as possible, that is, narrow borders are used to achieve the goal. The news from the press conference is that the frame of vivo is 2.3mm, and the screen ratio reaches 75.11%.

The narrow border ensures that the screen is as large as possible and the body is as small as possible.

In order to verify this statement, we found several models with 5.7-inch screens in ZOL product library to compare their body sizes. It is intuitive to see that vivo is the smallest among 5.7-inch models regardless of height, width and thickness. It is also the only model with 1080p full HD resolution and the largest battery capacity.

The top of the screen of vivo is designed as a conventional earpiece, with LED indicator lights and light/distance sensors on both sides; A 5-megapixel front camera with an 88-degree wide angle is placed in the upper right corner. The design of large wide angle is very popular nowadays, especially for female users who like to take selfies with several people. The adoption of large wide angle can easily let more people fit into the lens.

Top sensor and 500w pixel camera

Touch buttons at the bottom, no physical keys; The light is slightly insufficient, and the small line design is easy to find it at night.

The lighting of the touch button is slightly insufficient.

Double speakers with stainless steel metal shell

Like last year’s vivo X1, vivo still adopts a three-stage back shape; However, due to the increase in the size of the fuselage, it is obviously larger and thicker than the vivo X1. The corners are not as ultra-thin as the vivo X1, but are covered with thick and steady edges. The stainless steel back shell in the middle section feels good, and the paint coating process makes it smoother than the slightly astringent feel of the iPhone5, which is somewhat similar to the metal feel on the MacBook or One. Both sides of the stainless steel shell are made of plastic, and the design of double speakers ensures a good external effect.

Double speakers with stainless steel back shell

A 13-megapixel camera is placed at the joint between the stainless steel shell and the plastic component above, and the noise-reducing mic and LED flash are below; The logo of vivo is embedded in the stainless steel shell, which is also quite graded. On the left side of the fuselage, there is only the pin slot of the microSIM card, and on the right side, there are metal buttons.

Anodized alumina key

  
Vivo use effect

Although the design is not too amazing, vivo is still excellent in terms of body material and workmanship; The stainless steel shell and paint coating on the back feel comfortable; Due to the narrow bezel design, the 5.7-inch screen is not as exaggerated as other products of the same size. There is nothing too prominent in the front panel design.

Display effect with rich layers and large visual angle

The screen of vivo uses LTPS (Low temperature polysilicon material) -TFT-LCD, the former is also used in 5, and at the same time, it is also used.IPS technology; For the time being, we will understand the screen effect of vivo from the actual viewing experience-of course, the actual demand is just that.

Screen display effect experience

So we still use the iPhone 5 with excellent screen quality as a comparison, to take a real picture of solid color and multi-color contrast, as well as the final multi-angle visual angle comparison; The first is the comparison of the display effects of pure white and red, blue and green primary colors.

Comparison of green display effect

Comparison of display effect of pure white color map

Comparison of display effect of red graph

Comparison of display effect of pure blue diagram

Comparison of green display effect

The pure color images of the two are almost the same, and there is almost no color deviation. The only difference is that the vivo will look a little rich in color but the gap is very small. Compared with the pure white picture, vivo is slightly reddish.

Comparison of picture display effect

Comparison of picture display effect

caption

Comparison of picture display effect

Comparison of picture display effect

If you watch it carefully, the 1080p screen is indeed dominant in the actual picture display. Because the increase in the number of pixels will inevitably show more details and color levels, which is far from the small screen of iPhone5. In the comparison of portrait pictures, the saturation of vivo is higher.

Visual angle contrast

Visual angle contrast

Visual angle contrast

Visual angle contrast

Visual angle contrast

Visual angle contrast

From the visual angle comparison, the brightness of vivo is slightly weakened under the diagonal angle of view, and the front and side angles are still similar, and it can even be said that vivo has a slight advantage in brightness. On the whole, each has its own merits; For more and more audio and video usage scenarios, the big screen obviously has incomparable visual effects for iPhone, and 1080p is also a very good choice if you don’t care about the pressure and cost on system performance.

Use the small screen to control the big screen.

The system interface of vivo is still very different from the previous vivo X1. Emphasis on the use of highlights and emphasis on technology in color and texture. The screen lock interface is a practical combination of dynamic weather and camera. Let’s still use a video to understand the operation mode.

Video small screen mode and screen locking operation

  
Vivo’s lock screen player

Small screen mode that is more versatile than one-handed mode.

At first glance, the most special system interface of vivo should be "small screen mode". We also see that many large-screen machines have built-in "one-hand mode", but it is only suitable for telephone messages and other content. The "small screen mode" of vivo is aimed at the overall situation, and it is completely a scaled-down interface, which interfaces with a large-scale complete system.Mode of operationandDisplay contentComplete synchronization.

Of course, there is still a simple "one-handed mode" in vivo, which can only be used in the keyboard and dialing interface for texting.

  
Small screen mode versus simple one-handed mode

Moreover, the size of the "small screen mode" can be adjusted. Of course, I still suggest that you adjust it to the maximum size of 3.5 inches, which is the size of 4/4 s.

But the author found thatThis size is not equal to reality, and it is the same height and slightly narrower than the 3.5-inch iPhone 4.The resolution is very fine. However, it is very easy to operate, compared with the full size of 5.

Transformers scene desktop

  
Transformers’ new "Scene Desktop"

The form of "scene desktop" is also reserved in vivo, and the Transformers theme like the above picture is added. Compared with the classic desktop, the author is still willing to regard it as a flasher, which may not be easy to master in actual use unless you are particularly familiar with its operation.

NFC quick operation tag with sliding screen in space

In addition to the "small screen mode" mentioned above, vivo continues some somatosensory operations added before, and it is more abundant. For example, functions such as "air operation" and "smart bright screen" are added for the first time. It is not difficult to understand. The operation from a distance is to recognize the waving action through the front camera, so that you can look at photos or turn over the screen without touching the screen. The smart bright screen is to recognize the eyes’ gaze when the screen is about to go out and light up again.

  
"Operation from Space" Intelligent Somatosensory

As for where to use it, we think that "remote operation" can be used when you have oil stains or water stains on your hands, and the similar function of "smart bright screen" has been used before, and the usage must be known to everyone.

In addition, "WAY!" has been added to vivo. This function is aimed at people who love to travel. It provides 360-degree panoramic photos of some famous scenic spots and brief introduction. The quality of the pictures is very high and it has a very immersive feeling. There are also a large number of panoramic views of destinations in online content, so you can look at them in advance before you want to go anywhere.

Panoramic photos of WAY tourist attractions

Panoramic photos of WAY tourist attractions

On the use of NFC shortcut tags

Use of video NFC shortcut tags

Vivo also supports the function of NFC quick tag, and the recognition position is in the rear camera area. At present, OPPO Find 5, LG Optimus G Pro and perhaps other unknown models support this function; Several NFC tags are also included in the package. You can use vivo to write the tags into specific functions, and then paste them in specific places. In this way, when we touch them with vivo, we can quickly turn on the corresponding functions.

A new -Fi experience created by three chips

The promotion of vivo has always been positioned as the "flagship of audio and video", so the audio and video function is naturally the most valued place. As far as music is concerned, before vivo X1, two chips, CS8422+CS4398, were inserted for the first time, which were used to decode DAC independently without relying on SoC.

Vivo still takes audio and video as the main event.

Newcomer OPA2604 operational amplifier chip

The upgrade is that vivo has added OPA2604 operational amplifier chip on the basis of keeping CS8422 and CS4398, and the normal voltage of 3.7v is raised to 5.8v by boosting to supply it to the operational amplifier chip; This means that in addition to earplugs, the thrust of vivo will become greater, which can better promote some high-impedance large headphones.

Compared with vivo X1, vivo has added OPA2604 operational amplifier chip.

In addition to the attached XE600, the author also tried a large earphone like UE900 earplug or even HD600. The push of 600 is still a bit tasteful, and the sound field is quite broad; As for the more detailed sound quality test, we are still preparing, and we will also bring more detailed listening and actual quality tests later.

Still not supported

It still retains a similar style as before. As an audio-visual flagship, it can naturally support lossless formats such as APE and WAV except MP3, WMA and M4A. However, there is still no support for CUE playlist, and it is still not easy to choose tracks for APE or FLAC files of the whole track.

In addition to the basic playing quality, vivo also pays more attention to the construction of resources. By integrating Baidu music to provide high-quality 320kbps audio, you can even audition and lossless format directly. However, compared with the richness of MP3, there is still not much lossless music provided, but it seems that any music enthusiast does not have to get it online and must have a pile of inventory in his hand. It is convenient to listen to music online in general format, and it also contains relatively new lists and popular radio functions.

Three-magnetic-circuit loudspeaker contrast BoomSound

Another performance of "audio-visual flagship" is naturally video, so first of all, we still use 15 pieces of 1080p resolution multi-format video content for local decoding test; Although we don’t think that the platform of Snapdragon 600 will have any difficulty in dealing with these, even MT6589 is enough, but let’s give it a try.

1080p test results

Except for two MOVs that are not natively supported, other formats of 1080p resolution video can be played completely and smoothly. Because the test time is ahead of schedule, we have provided support for MOV in the latest vivo system update we received on May 27th.

Video resources are also integrated with LeTV and other resources. Today’s mainstream video clients have 720p or even 1080p film sources; Although the rate is very high and can’t compare with the quality of local video, it is still qualitatively improved compared with the previous "standard definition era".

  
With letv TV

Three-magnetic circuit speaker +SRS contrast BoomSound+Beats

Although the sound quality of the built-in output is good, sometimes we need to play the sound externally. Therefore, we also tested the external effect of vivo by the way. After all, it is equipped with dual speakers and can turn on SRS surround.Three-magnetic circuit loudspeaker, "sound phase following" technology and 0.4mm micro-hole positive sound cavity. But for most people, these nouns are no different from floating clouds. In the end, you have to listen to the effect.

Vivo with dual speakers design

These nouns are probably the easiest to understand.Follow the sound.To put it simply: people who are used to using their right hands are used to watching videos in a counterclockwise horizontal screen, and then the left and right channels of the mobile phone are correct. People who are used to watching videos with their left hands will horizontally screen their mobile phones clockwise. At this time, the left and right channels will be reversed, and the viewing effect is very poor. The left and right channel signals with the help of "pan-following" technology will also be automatically adjusted and exchanged with the position of the picture.

Three-magnetic circuit speaker +SRS contrast BoomSound+Beats

We might as well compare the effect of external playback. The comparison product is One, because the author’s recent experience really shocked its BoomSound external playback sound. We also used the recording pen for external recording, and turned on the sound effects supported by the two mobile phones to compare the actual effects of their external sound.

Comparative fragment 1 of external release effect

Comparative fragment 2 of external release effect

I thought the volume of BoomSound was abundant, but I didn’t expect the order of magnitude of vivo to be heavier.. From the recorded sound, we can roughly hear the slight difference between the two. vivo has opened SRS surround sound, so it creates a large sound field and has a certain surround effect. The BoomSound sound of HTC One is more concentrated and powerful.

Random OTG expansion unlimited capacity

Vivo has prepared two versions of 16GB and 32GB ROM. Although the capacity is quite sufficient in the current models, in fact, if you really want to watch 1080p film sources on it, experienced friends must know that the capacity is not enough. A 720p movie compressed into MKV will cost about 4~6GB, not to mention 1080p.

video

Fortunately, however, vivo supports OTG, and the OTG cable is standard, which means that we can directly let vivo read files, especially large videos, in the U disk or mobile hard disk. As for whether the effect and speed can be supported well, we also demonstrate it through the video above. The rate is still very good, and it is not a problem to support 1080p video transmission and playback with general bit rate.

Actual power consumption test of large screen and three chips

In order to cope with the three chips specially used for -Fi and the large screen of Snapdragon 600 and 1080p, vivo also has a built-in battery with a capacity of 3400 mAh. Considering that the addition of Hi-Fi processing is still more power-consuming than normal, we also specially tested the battery life of vivo in two aspects.

GLBenchmark battery test

Firstly, in theory, we adopt Battery Test of GLBenchmark 2.5.1 as the detection method. It simulates a 3D game scene, and the battery life of vivo is 168 minutes (the power is reduced from 100% to 10%). Although it sounds short, the test conditions are very strict, which is equivalent toPlay 3D games at a frame rate of up to 60fps with 100% screen brightness.. Theoretically, we can play for 168 minutes under such conditions.

Test discharge curve of vivo GLBenchmark battery

You still don’t think three hours or so is enough time to play? Actually, otherwise, we also found the GLBenchmark battery test in the cross review of quad-core mobile phones at the beginning of the year, because the parameters used in the cross review at that time were"100% brightness, 30fps"Compared with the conditions we just used, it is simpler, so the endurance performance of vivo is not bad.

GLBenchmark battery test for other modelsAchievement reference

Power consumption test of actual video music playback

Of course, as an audio-visual flagship, many people will certainly use it for video or Hi-Fi music; Therefore, in practical application, we also use Hi-Fi music playback to test the power consumption of vivo.

Power consumption test of actual video music playback

With 46% power remaining in the initial state, vivo is connected to the system.Bring your own XE600 headphones and turn on Hi-Fi., the power consumption for half an hour is 4%; Then, under the condition of 100% screen brightness and playing 1080p video, the power consumption of playing for half an hour is 7%. The power consumption is similar to that of the model without any professional audio decoding chip, so the power consumption of Hi-Fi has some influence on the system, but it is also within a reasonable range.

13 million photos are usually good, weak light and obvious noise.

13-megapixel camera has become the standard in flagship machine. Even though vivo is positioned as the flagship of audio and video instead of taking pictures, it is also equipped with a 13-megapixel Exmor RS stacked camera. It is also equipped with a 2100-line resolution 5P lens and a blue glass blue filter, which supports 1080P HD video recording and has functions such as beauty, smiling shutter and best photo taking. The front camera has 5 million pixels and a wide angle of 88 degrees.

13 megapixel camera

Although they all use Exmor RS stacked CMOS photosensitive elements, the in-machine processing level of each family is also different, so we can see that the final proofs of several recent models using this CMOS are very different; So let’s take a look at the camera level of vivo from the actual shooting effect. (The proofs are selected from indoor, outdoor, macro, night scene and other scenes, and all of them keep the original big picture.)

Outdoor sceneProof:

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

The imaging quality of this CMOS has been verified a lot, and the adjustment of vivo is also very good in outdoor light, which reflects the real scene of cloudy days … without any obvious shortcomings; However, I want to remind you that the metering system in this light is not very reliable. If the second sample does not manually measure the light in the lower left corner, the picture will be dark.

Indoor scene sample:

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

Generally speaking, there are no shortcomings in color in the room, but the picture also shows two situations according to the different lighting conditions; Under the condition of sufficient light in the supermarket, the detail expression is very good, even if it is enlarged to 100%, the fine print is still legible. However, if the light is not sufficient, noise will begin to appear more obviously.

Macro scene sample:

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

Macro performance is basically equivalent to indoor effect, and the color is not obviously biased, but noise is easy to appear in the case of insufficient lighting.

Night scene sample:

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

13 megapixel photo sample (click to view larger image)

The light of the night scene sample is well controlled, and there is no messy glare; However, it can be seen from the enlarged photos that the noise is still quite obvious.

Summary of lateral comparison and evaluation of Snapdragon 600 performance

Let’s recall the previous vivo X1. Although it also uses the combination of dual chips in audio, the performance of MT6577 processor is not very good as far as I am concerned. Now vivo has completely filled this short board and upgraded the platform to the top Snapdragon 600.

Snapdragon 600 compares S4 Pro again.

Comparison of Snapdragon APQ8064 parameters with Snapdragon 600 processor.
(The picture comes from "How much is the new and old four nuclear confrontation Snapdragon 600 better than APQ8064? 》）

As for Snapdragon 600, it has been adopted by LG Optimus G Pro, One, American S4 and other models, and there may be many friends who can’t tell the difference between it and the previous S4 Pro series. Compared with the Krait 200 kernel of APQ8064, Snapdragon 600 adopts an optimized version of Krait 300. However, it can be seen from the previous disassembly of the HTC One Snapdragon 600 processor by Chipworks that there is not much difference between the Snapdragon 600 (namely APQ8064T) and the previous S4 Pro (referring to APQ8064) in the kernel layout.

Microphotograph of APQ8064T kernel (image from Chipworks)

It can also be seen from the micrograph that the processor core of APQ8064T has the label "Avenger2", while the label in APQ8064 is "Avenger". In addition, both of them adopt 28nm process, and the core size is 9.92×8.88 mm. Compared with APQ8064, the frequency of APQ8064T is increased to 1.7GHz (the US version is the highest specification of 1.9GHz).

APQ8064T kernel code (image from Chipworks)

Transverse performance test of five Snapdragon 600 s and one S4 Pro.

In addition to the individual performance test for vivo, we also found several products with the same or similar processor platforms for simple performance comparison. The Snapdragon 600 products provided by official website, Qualcomm, USA are LG Optimus G Pro, American Samsung S4 and HTC One, which seems to ignore the domestic 2S and the vivo we see now.

Comparison of test scores

Quadrant test score comparison

GLBenchmark test score comparison (HTC Butterfly has no data)

Comparison of Vellamo test scores

Since there are several models of Snapdragon 600, we can adopt them together, and by the way, we added HTC Butterfly, a model adopting Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064.

The test results show that, except for LG Optimus G Pro, which had a serious frequency reduction during the evaluation at that time, other models using Snapdragon 600 platform achieved similar results; Moreover, compared with HTC Butterfly, which adopts APQ8064, the performance improvement is obvious, and the main difference lies in the CPU, and the GPU is the same as Adreno 320, and the performance difference is not very big. And we don’t think such a gap is enough to make obvious differences in use.All in all, the performance of vivo can still compete with Optimus G Pro and HTC One.

The naming method of APQ8064 Pro about Xiaomi 2S is different from that of Qualcomm, which has not been officially confirmed and explained. It is only speculated that it belongs to Xiaolong 600.

Evaluation summary:

Comprehensive evaluation of well-deserved audio-visual flagship vivo

As mentioned in the title, in terms of audio-visual experience alone, the comprehensive strength of vivo is worthy of its title of "audio-visual flagship"-in terms of video, few models equipped with large screens adopt Snapdragon 600 platform with such strong performance, and even few adopt 1080p resolution, not to mention the parts that other models can integrate, such as network video resources. In terms of hardware capabilities alone, the display quality of screens, audio decoding quality and the external speakers. In terms of music, although more detailed special tests need to be launched later, it can be said that you are unlikely to find a mobile phone with better sound quality and thrust.

Of course, in addition to the audio-visual experience, vivo still has some problems, such as too much noise in the night shooting of the camera and the complicated icon style of the system; Moreover, as a model with the main music function, vivo still can’t support the list of APE/ on the whole track, which makes the selection of music complicated.

Concentrate on your strengths and do what you are good at.

In 2013, everyone was playing experience cards and technology cards. Some manufacturers, such as Lenovo and ZTE, were looking for breakthroughs in design to create unique and even all-metal shapes to please consumers’ attention. Some manufacturers, such as Samsung, seek to find breakthroughs in services and continue to carry forward intelligent operations and other content; Some manufacturers use their own superior resources to transfer the superior technologies of other product lines to the mobile phone product line. For example, Huawei uses the advantages of network technology to build D2 into a model supporting the fastest LTE network, and BBK uses the advantages of making music to make vivo into the flagship of audio and video today. Next, we will see that the One Sony strategy is integrated into the all-round technology of display, Walkman and even CyberShot on mobile phones.

If vivo X1 is just a simple attempt of -Fi, vivo is a concentrated bloom; In a word, vivo is not only worthy of the title of current audio-visual flagship, but also has good performance. As for the price/performance ratio, let’s compare it ourselves.

Attachment: Professional Running Test 1
 
Comprehensive performance test—

 AnTuTu（）

  
Test score 23670

Super Rabbit System Evaluation AnTuTu is a software specially designed for Android system, which can run complete test items with one click, and pass many performance tests such as memory performance, CPU integer performance, CPU floating point performance, 2D and 3D drawing performance, database I/O, SD card reading and writing speed, etc., and score the overall and individual hardware performance of the mobile phone. At the same time, upload scores and check the ranking of the device in the world.

  Basemark OS

  
Basemark OS test score

BasemarkOS is a software for measuring the overall performance of equipment system level, and the test items include system test (standard according to application, message service, Java, file operation, storage, data base, and Bluetooth, dialer, etc.). Graphic testing (2D imaging, graphic scaling, JPEG, PNG and GIF encoding and decoding, 3D game testing); Use example tests (calendars, contacts, etc.).

 Quadrant Advanced Edition

Developed by Aurora Softworks, Quadrant is a veteran performance testing tool for mobile devices. Its testing scope includes 12 CPU tests, 1 memory test, 4 I/O tests, 1 2D graphics processing test and 3 3D graphics processing tests, and finally the comprehensive score of a tested device is fed back. Devices without GPU units cannot run this software. Theoretically, the higher the score, the stronger the hardware comprehensive performance of the tested equipment.

  
Quadrant test score 10729

Quadrant includes three versions: Standard, Advanced and Professional. The Advanced version not only provides the final test results, but also provides offline browsing and advanced settings. There is no difference in function between Professional and Advanced, except that the former is aimed at commercial users (such as agents and mobile phone manufacturers) and the software price is higher. Our test choice: Quadrant Advanced Edition.

CPU memory performance test-

AndEbench (divided into AndEMark Native and AndEMark Java)

AndEBench is a software released in 2012, which provides a way to evaluate the performance of Android platform, and can test the performance of CPU and Dalvik(Dalvik is a soft device in Android system, which is responsible for running applications, so it is also one of the main parts of Android), and compare the local and Java performance of different devices. This test software can also prove the multithreading performance of a platform, and its final running is divided into two aspects: the execution efficiency for native pre-installed applications and the execution efficiency for third-party applications installed separately.

  
AndEBench/Memory test score

Memory（Stream）

Memory(Stream) is a memory test software. We can know the memory management performance of the mobile phone through the test scores of several sub-items such as Copy (data copy), Scale (capacity), Add (addition) and Triad (synthesis) and the comprehensive scores. The higher the score, the better the memory management performance of the device.

  Linpack

  
Linpack test score

Linpack has become the most popular benchmark for testing the floating-point performance of high-performance computer systems in the world. By using a high-performance computer, the floating-point performance of the high-performance computer is evaluated by using gauss elimination to solve a set of linear algebraic equations with n degree density. Compared with computers, the Linpack software of Android mobile phone version is relatively simplified, and the latest version only contains single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. As the name implies, the stronger the processor’s computing power, the higher the score. The advantages of dual-core and even future multi-core processors are reflected in the multi-thread testing part, and the test results are given in floating-point operations per second (Flops).

Attachment: Professional Running Test II

GPU graphics test—

  
3Dmark test score

3DMark for Android provides two test standards, namely: Ice Storm (Standard Edition): the default rendering setting is 1280×720p resolution, 128MB GPU memory occupation, low texture quality and 1/8th floodlight resolution. Ice Storm Extreme: The default rendering settings are improved to 1920×1080p resolution, 256MB GPU memory occupation, high texture quality and 1/4 floodlight resolution.

  
3DMark leaderboard reference

  Basemark ES 2.0 Taiji

Basemarks test score

Basemark ES 2.0 Taiji is a graphics testing software, which uses a pre-designed screen scene of a girl playing Tai Chi to test the three-dimensional graphics performance of the equipment, from which we can know how fast the tested equipment performs in the background of games and graphics.

Basemark X

Basemark X test score

Basemark X can be mainly used to evaluate the game image performance of iOS, Android and Windows Phone 8 devices, and supports cross-platform comparison. The uniqueness of this benchmark tool is that it is the only professional evaluation software based on the real game engine Unity4, which can generate high-quality performance comparison results.

Basemark X is designed according to the usage of 3D games now or even in the future, and can test equipment in a very high state. Basemark X mainly tests the contents of games, including particle special effects, advanced lighting effects and post-processing, and can mainly test the GPU performance of hardware devices.

Gl benchmark 2.5.1 (eygpt & HD+on/off screen, with four parts to be tested)

GLBenchmark test score

GLBenchmark2.5 is a graphical testing software, which contains more than 30 benchmark projects. GLBenchmark 2.5 is optimized for high-definition equipment based on GLBenchmark 2.1, which mainly includes high-quality 3D scenes, including brand-new Egyptian scenes in HD version and normal version. The HD version of Egypt has been upgraded for the previous test items, with more complicated pictures, more high-resolution maps and optimization for 1080P devices.

Test-

 Sunspider0.9.1

Sunspider test score

Sunspider0.9.1 is aimed at the browser test items, and the browser’s advantages and disadvantages are considered by the display speed of various data, including graphics, etc. The included test items are very complicated. Through the test of 3d, bitops, math, string and other items, a total score is obtained, and the score is recorded in milliseconds (ms). The lower the final value, the shorter the time, which proves that the browser’s performance is better.

  Vellamo

Vellamo is a benchmark application developed by Qualcomm (similar to Neocore), which allows you to test the performance and stability of the browser, including Java script performance, rendering, networking and user interface. The result of this tool also includes several sub-items, but we only take the total score. The higher the score, the higher the optimization degree of the mobile phone to the browser and the better the web browsing experience.

  
Vellamo test score

Vellamo, as a mobile web ruler tool, has now been expanded to include two main modules. HTML5 module can be used to evaluate the performance of mobile web browser, while Metal module can measure the performance of CPU subsystem of mobile processor. The test suite is easy to click and use, and it is managed by modules. Vellamo can evaluate many aspects such as scrolling and zooming, 3D graphics, video performance, memory reading and writing, bandwidth peak performance and so on.

HTML5 test-

FishIE Tank (set to 50 fish)

FishIE Tank tests the device’s HTML5 performance through a picture full of fish in the webpage, in which the number of fish can be set. During the test, the fish are constantly swimming. In the case of the same number of fish in different devices, the faster the swimming speed, the stronger the HTML5 performance, and the corresponding score will be given on the left side of the page. Similarly, the higher the score, the better.

FishIE Tank

HTML5 is the next major revision of html, and it is still in the development stage. Its main benefit is to strengthen the performance of Web pages and provide better search engine optimization. The Web APP developed based on HTML5 has shorter startup time and faster networking speed, especially for mobile users, which has better picture speed and more exquisite web animation effect.

The demand of video for the system is no more than that of music, and it needs hardware support with better performance; Therefore, we can see that vivo Xplay not only added an additional operational amplifier chip on the original basis, but also transformed the dual speakers, and directly adopted the top performance Snapdragon 600 platform.